From d59fbe003a3fd3d391b39a88175ff3837287d6fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Koelle <stefan.koelle@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:58:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Amiga card titles on retro index, add cross-links between
 Amiga pages

---
 retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/index.njk |  4 ++--
 retro/amiga-modern-platforms/index.njk   |  1 +
 retro/index.njk                          | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/index.njk b/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/index.njk
index 544b08f..7140204 100644
--- a/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/index.njk
+++ b/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/index.njk
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ parent: "/retro/"
 <h1>Running AmigaOS in 2026: MiSTer FPGA vs Amiberry on Pi</h1>
 <div class="detail-content">
 
-<p>AmigaOS 3.2.3 runs beautifully both on FPGA and on modern ARM boards, the question is which trade-offs you're willing to accept. Both approaches have their place, and the choice often comes down to what you're trying to do: run demos at perfect timing, or tinker with software at higher resolutions.</p>
+<p>AmigaOS 3.2.3 runs beautifully both on FPGA and on modern ARM boards, the question is which trade-offs you're willing to accept. Both approaches have their place, and the choice often comes down to what you're trying to do: run demos at perfect timing, or tinker with software at higher resolutions. If you're weighing up the hardware options themselves (Vampire V4, A600GS or MiSTer) rather than the OS, head over to the <a href="/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/">hardware comparison</a>.</p>
 
 <h2>Two Roads to the Same Workbench</h2>
 <ul>
-<li><strong>MiSTer with the Minimig-AGA core</strong>, the most hardware-authentic option. Native resolution tops out around 800×600, with RTG (Picasso96) support pushing that up to 1080p. Timing accuracy and near-zero input latency make it the pick for demos and cycle-sensitive software.</li>
+<li><strong>MiSTer with the <a href="/retro/mist-mister-fpga/">Minimig-AGA core</a></strong>, the most hardware-authentic option. Native resolution tops out around 800×600, with RTG (Picasso96) support pushing that up to 1080p. Timing accuracy and near-zero input latency make it the pick for demos and cycle-sensitive software.</li>
 <li><strong>Amiberry on a Raspberry Pi</strong>, the flexible option. Running headless (no X11 desktop, straight from the console/KMS framebuffer) is the single biggest performance lever, the difference between a laggy desktop and a snappy 60fps Workbench.</li>
 <li><strong>The HDF minefield</strong>, hard disk image files either carry an RDB partition table or they don't, and getting the geometry parameters (surfaces/sectors/reserved blocks) wrong produces the classic "Not a DOS disk in device DH0" error. Reformatting through HDToolBox from a fresh install is often faster than debugging geometry math.</li>
 <li><strong>Picking a monitor</strong>, a 4:3 panel at native 1280×1024 (like an older NEC MultiSync) gives the most period-accurate Workbench experience; anything widescreen needs scaling compromises.</li>
diff --git a/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/index.njk b/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/index.njk
index c430929..0d9d071 100644
--- a/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/index.njk
+++ b/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/index.njk
@@ -25,4 +25,5 @@ parent: "/retro/"
 <p>For now I'm not running original hardware, I reproduce my Amiga on the <a href="/retro/mist-mister-fpga/">MiSTer FPGA</a> using the Minimig core. My classic Amiga is mapped out there with Workbench and the tools I used back in the day, spread across different configurations and several Workbench versions, so I can revisit exactly how the machine felt across the years.</p>
 <p>I've also spent time with <a href="/retro/pimiga-journey/">PiMiga</a>, an Amiga-on-a-Raspberry-Pi distro that bundles Amiberry with a full A1200 AGA setup and Workbench 3.1. It's not real hardware, but it's another way to run the machine cheaply, and I documented how the different versions compare.</p>
 <p>I'm still keen on the real thing, though. Retro Games Ltd. is shipping an Amiga 1200 console on 4 December 2026, and I've been following everything public about it. There's a dedicated page on that: <a href="/retro/the-a1200/">The A1200: Release Date, Specs and What's Included</a>.</p>
+<p>If you want the detail on getting AmigaOS itself running across MiSTer and Amiberry, rather than comparing the hardware, that's covered on the <a href="/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/">Running AmigaOS in 2026</a> page.</p>
 </div>
diff --git a/retro/index.njk b/retro/index.njk
index 6b86085..3b546f5 100644
--- a/retro/index.njk
+++ b/retro/index.njk
@@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ sections:
         href: "/retro/atari-networking-bbs/"
   - heading: "Amiga Corner"
     cards:
-      - title: "💾 AmigaOS on Modern Platforms"
-        summary: "How I run my Amiga on modern hardware, MiSTer FPGA (Minimig) and PiMiga, while still wanting the real thing, plus an Amiga 1200 console on the way."
+      - title: "⚔️ Vampire, A600GS or MiSTer"
+        summary: "Why comparing modern Amiga hardware options by benchmark numbers alone is actively misleading, and how I run my Amiga today."
         href: "/retro/amiga-modern-platforms/"
+      - title: "💾 Running AmigaOS in 2026"
+        summary: "MiSTer FPGA versus Amiberry on a Raspberry Pi, two very different ways to get a fully working AmigaOS 3.2.3 desktop today."
+        href: "/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/"
       - title: "🥧 The PiMiga Journey"
         summary: "Three generations of the PiMiga distro compared, and why the newest release isn't automatically the best one."
         href: "/retro/pimiga-journey/"
-      - title: "⚔️ Vampire, A600GS or MiSTer"
-        summary: "Why comparing modern Amiga hardware by benchmark numbers alone is actively misleading."
-        href: "/retro/amiga-hardware-landscape/"
       - title: "📦 The A1200"
         summary: "What's confirmed so far about Retro Games Ltd.'s upcoming Amiga 1200 console, ahead of its 2026 launch."
         href: "/retro/the-a1200/"