--- title: "Vampire V4, A600GS or MiSTer: Amiga Hardware Isn't a Simple Speed Race" section: "retro" tags: "retro" description: "Why raw benchmark numbers are actively misleading when comparing modern Amiga hardware options." layout: base.njk parent: "/retro/" ---

Vampire V4, A600GS or MiSTer: Amiga Hardware Isn't a Simple Speed Race

Trying to compare Amiga hardware options by benchmark numbers alone is a trap. A Dhrystone score from a real FPGA CPU implementation and an ARM chip's MIPS rating measure completely different things, and neither tells you much about which system will actually run your favourite demo correctly.

The Contenders

Conclusion after digging through all three: if you already own a working MiSTer, there's no compelling reason to chase the newer ARM boards for "better" performance, the practical difference is marginal, and MiSTer's broader core library wins in the long run.

How I Run My Amiga Today

For now I'm not running original hardware, I reproduce my Amiga on the MiSTer FPGA using the Minimig core. My classic Amiga is mapped out there with Workbench and the tools I used back in the day, spread across different configurations and several Workbench versions, so I can revisit exactly how the machine felt across the years.

I'm still keen on the real thing, though. Retro Games Ltd. is working on an Amiga 1200 console, and I've been following everything public about it. There's a dedicated page on that: The A1200: What We Know Before It Ships.